Hey there, @adrienne and @Shane
[[NAME]] is reaching their annual review on [[DATE]]. Here are my notes for the review:
STATS:
--PQ Score v. team average:
--NM score v. team average:
--Kickbacks average v. team:
--Revisions average v. team:
--Projects completed v. team:
--Career Devs completed:
--CCW Matches:
GOAL PROGRESS:
--Current goal & goal progress:
--Summary of goal(s) completed in the last year:
RATE OF HARD SKILL DEVELOPMENT:
--Fast/Medium/Slow quality improvement:
--Reasoning for the answer above:
--Ability to apply feedback:
FUTURE FOCUSED:
--Talent score given at 6-month review V current talent score (AVG TEAM MEMBER = 35) /50
--Talent score at 1 year / 50:
--Future goal ideas:
TWO MAIN STRENGTHS OF TEAM MEMBER:
TWO MAIN GROWTH AREAS OF TEAM MEMBER:
NEW OPP INTRO:
--[FX: IF IN TOP 25% OF TEAM] Team member is in VERY GOOD standing and on track to be placed in a pod at 1.5y mark! There potential industry specialties could be [[INSERT INDUSTRY SPECIALTIES]] @Adrienne
--[FX: IF IN 50% OF TEAM] Team member is in GOOD standing and on track to potentially be placed in a pod at 2-year mark. Potentialy industry matches and goals to help them reach squad pod placement include [[[]]]] @adrienne
--[FX: IF IN LOW STANDING] Team member is in lower standing and will need to make improvement before 1.5y mark to be placed in a pod! @adrienne
MANGO SHOUTOUT - PLEASE POST ON [[DAY OF REVIEW]] @Shane
[insert mango shoutout here as it should appear and include a suggested gif to include]]
Comments
0 B
|👍
/👎
0 B
|👍
/👎
0 B
|👍
/👎
0 B
|👍
/👎
0 B
|👍
/👎
0 B
|👍
/👎
0 B
|👍
/👎
0 B
|👍
/👎
0 B
|👍
/👎